Abstract

Several prominent philosophers of science (Cartwright [2], Dupré [3], Hausman [8], [9], Hitchcock [10]) pose a problem for the probabilistic theory of causally called the unanimity theory. In this paper, I focus on Hitchcock’s criticism of the unanimity theory. I critically examine Hitchcock’s argument against the unanimity theory. After introducing the desirable features of the unanimity theory, I show that the unanimity theory too does the same job Hitchcock’s theory is intended to do. I conclude that the criticism of the unanimity theory on the contrary reveals the versatility of the unanimity theory some philosophers of science and some computer scientists ([17], [21]) do not notice.